Claude Code in CI/CD without handing it the keys
Headless Claude Code reviewing pull requests and fixing failing builds in GitHub Actions against Amazon Bedrock, with a trust boundary untrusted PR content can't cross and merging left to people.
Services
01 · The problem
“Everyone uses Claude differently and nothing carries over.”
“Our developers have Claude Code but output quality varies wildly.”
02 · Diagnosis
People using Claude is not the same as a team operating it. Operating means a configured baseline that everyone starts from, not a blank slate each time.
03 · Outcomes
Claude Code for engineering teams is the core of the engagement. Organisation-wide Claude is a secondary track that extends what we set up for your engineers to the rest of the organisation.
04 · Engagement
05 · Honest limit
Enablement doesn't stick without an internal owner. We set it up and train that person rather than becoming the dependency.
06 · Proof
From our writing on Claude Code for teams and enterprise.
Headless Claude Code reviewing pull requests and fixing failing builds in GitHub Actions against Amazon Bedrock, with a trust boundary untrusted PR content can't cross and merging left to people.
Scope Claude Code to the slice of your monorepo a task touches: layered CLAUDE.md files, path-scoped rules, sibling grants, and cheaper search.
Turn CLAUDE.md best practices into a contract: few verifiable clauses, path-scoped rules, hooks for hard limits, and a repeatable adherence audit.
Treat Claude Code context window management as a performance budget: profile with /context, cut MCP overhead, and spend tokens on real work.
Learn when to interrupt Claude Code, when to rewind, and when to reset. A cost-ordered framework for corrections that compound with context depth.
Decide when to use plan mode vs subagents in Claude Code with an escalation ladder that prices every rung, from hand edits to headless fan-out.